" For better or worse"Human Genome-A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived.

Told by a scientist, these stories of our genes are not the scripted versions we have heard before

‘You carry an epic poem in your cells,’ writes Adam Rutherford in ‘A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived’.

Sci-fied reality is very much here and now. The twenty-first century arrived almost twenty years ago, and it is no surprise that flying taxis, choppers in space, bot-human love stories or even the existence of a new species existence get written every other day. Alongside all of this, there are scientists like Adam Rutherford, who says that the ultimate storage device will be made of DNA.
This, of course, raises the important question: What are humans really, when it comes to consideration of genetics? Much as we think of ourselves as sophisticated species, we have fewer genes than a grain of rice. Yet, we are the only ones to ask, “What are we?” This enigma lies at the heart of Rutherford’s new book, A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived.
A riff on Stephen Hawking’s most accessible work, this book is heavy on ambition while being quick in pace and sweeping the reader off their feet from the word go. Rutherford, a geneticist who hosts the popular BBC Radio 4 show, Inside Science, sets the bar high by explaining how homo sapiens ought to understand the basic building block of life, the gene, to understand who we really are:
“Our genomes, genes and DNA house a record of the journey that life on Earth has taken – 4 billion years of error and trial that resulted in you. Your genome is the totality of your DNA, 3 billion letters of it, and due to the way it comes together – by the mysterious (from a biological point of view) business of sex – it is unique to you. Not only is this genetic fingerprint yours alone, it’s unlike any of the other 107 billion people who have ever lived.”
Perhaps to drive home this point, Rutherford serves up a crash course on the side in understanding gene studies, involving genome sequencing, DNA, genomes, alleles, chromosomes and more. To understand the gene, time travel is a must. After all, out of the six homo species, only ours has survived, having emerged some 30,000 years ago. The others were on earth for about 2 million years.
Rutherford explains that the simple chain of “monkey-ape to ape-man, to man-ape” is an untruth. The first in a series of untruths that he illuminates in the book. His other bone of contention is “the culturally ubiquitous idea that genes are fate, and a certain type of any one gene will determine exactly what an individual is like.”

All those myths

As the writer shuffles the deck of the cards we have been dealt, the realisation that ours might not be the first technological and cultural species gains currency. Cave paintings have in fact been attributed to Neanderthals by some. And, lest we contest our brutish selves, there is a theory that we perhaps hunted and made a meal of Neanderthals as well. But the beautiful irony of nature is such that some of us do carry Neanderthal genes.
Rutherford’s explanation of how 107 billion human beings came to inhabit different corners of the world goes up against the concept of race. He writes: “The latest analyses incorporate the fact that the current residents of a geographical area are not necessarily very good representatives of the residents of the deep past. Today’s Siberians are more like East Asians, but the ancient Siberians were more like Native Americans, mixed in with some northern Eurasian.” Identifying races, then, is pretty much like creating patterns in a star-studded sky.
Another wrong turn in our understanding of things, argues Rutherford, might be based on personal genome analysis, which has become a cheap and easily accessible service. The writer is at pains to point out that possession of certain genes cannot and do not guarantee you will contract a particular disease. It can only speak of your likelihood of falling prey to it, with the odds being calculated by comparing your score with the average.
The 3 billion letters of our DNA are ready to be read, but how they need to be read is an important question, warns Rutherford.

Where do we go from here?

The next question Rutherford tackles is: “Are we still evolving?” We aren’t inching towards the X-Men, he reasons, but we are certainly mutating. Vaishyas in South India are cited as proof, as seen in the abnormal reaction to many members of this “caste” to anaesthesia, ranging from no result to even death. Rutherford explains:
“By looking into their genomes, we learnt of a single change – a random switching of a single letter of the gene encoding the enzyme butyrylcholinesterase (BCHE), which normally helps degrade molecules in the blood similar to the anaesthetic.”
The startling fact that is this realignment of the allele – the form, dominant or recessive, in which a gene exists in an individual – in the Vaishya bloodline began at least 1,900 years ago. For better or worse, it appears, we are a species on the move.
On the lighter side, Rutherford offers scoops on the Human Genome Project (which mapped each and every gene in the human genome from both a physical and a functional perspective). For instance, scientists placed bets in a bar on the number of genes human beings would turn out to have as determined by the project. Rutherford’s quirky humour is often tucked away in the footnotes, throwing up delightful nuggets of information, such as the whimsical scientific names of certain species – “gorilla gorilla” is a scientific name, as is “extra extra” for a certain mollusc)
The appeal of this essentially scientific book lies in its ability to both inspire and provoke thought, thanks to Rutherford’s unique, rather poetic view of genetics. When a writer says, “You carry an epic poem in your cells,” the reader has no choice but to pay attention.
A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived: The Stories In Our Genes, Adam Rutherford, W&N.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
When did the lights first come on in the universe? A galaxy close to the dawn of time gives a clue
Astronomers have indirectly spotted some of the first stars in the universe.
Astronomers Find Signature From the Universe's Earliest Known Stars
Our complex universe—chock full of galaxies, black holes and quasars—didn't just appear after the Big Bang. For tens of millions of years, the universe was a ...
An expanding universe and distant stars—tips on how to experience cosmology from your backyard
For people like me, light years, the expanding universe and the Big Bang are part of daily language.
Phys.Org



When did the lights first come on in the universe? A galaxy close to the dawn of time gives a clue

Astronomers have indirectly spotted some of the first stars in the universe.

It is springtime in the Northern hemisphere. Countless buds that have been waiting patiently on the stems and branches of trees and shrubs are now blossoming into life. The cosmic equivalent of this season is the time between a few hundred million and a billion years after the Big Bang. This is when the first stars and galaxies ignited, spewing light into the dark universe.
It is a time in the history of the universe that we are desperate to chart, because it represents part of the cosmological story that we have yet to understand. Now astronomers have detected oxygen in a galaxy further away than ever before – and it existed just 500m years after the Big Bang. The results, published in Nature, are hugely important as they provide new insights into when the first stars formed.
The period of this “cosmic dawn” is important not only because this is when the first galaxies were born, but a crucial cosmic transition also took place. In this process, atoms in the electrically neutral intergalactic medium – a wide sea of hydrogen gas surrounding galaxies – were bombarded with ultraviolet radiation escaping from the first galaxies. This stripped away electrons from atoms and made the gas charged, or “ionised”.
The event, called the Epoch of Reionisation, is still mysterious. We’d like to know – or better yet, see – when this process started. Part of that quest involves finding the most distant galaxies.
Artist’s impression of the Epoch of Reionisation. Photo credit: ESA C. Carreau
Artist’s impression of the Epoch of Reionisation. Photo credit: ESA C. Carreau
When we look out into the universe we detect light that has taken some appreciable time to traverse the gulf that separates us from other stars and galaxies. The light from the screen you are reading this on has taken about a third of a nanosecond to reach your eyes. Light from the nearest star beyond our sun takes four years to reach us. Amazingly, light from the galaxy at the centre of the new study, called MACS1149-JD1, has taken 13 billion years to be detected here on Earth. That means we see MACS1149-JD1 as it was 13 billion years in the past, around 500m years after the Big Bang.

Powerful gaze

Using a telescope called the Atacama Large Millimetre/sub-millimetre Array, the scientists detected a strong signal (an emission line) within the distant galaxy. Just as a prism disperses the light of the sun into a rainbow spectrum, we can disperse the light of distant galaxies, too. This is called spectroscopy. Emission lines are bright spikes in the spectra of galaxies that originate from different elements that can each release light of a very specific energy.
This particular emission line came from ionised oxygen gas. Its presence tells us that the galaxy was forming stars at the time, because the energy required to ionise it must have come from massive, hot, young stars.
The ALMA Observatory.Carlos Padilla – Photo credit: AUI/NRAO
The ALMA Observatory.Carlos Padilla – Photo credit: AUI/NRAO
If we measured the same type of gas here on Earth, we would detect it at a wavelength of 0.088 millimetres. But other galaxies are receding away from us due to cosmic expansion, and this causes the light they emit to increase in wavelength during the time it takes for the photons to reach us. The more distant a galaxy is, the larger the increase in wavelength.
This is called redshift, and it ultimately tells us the ratio between the size of the universe when the light was first emitted and the size of the universe today. The oxygen emission line observed in MACS1149-JD1 is actually detected at 0.88 millimetres – its wavelength has been stretched by a factor of 10. This means that at the time the light was emitted, the universe was a factor of 10 times smaller than it is today, and just four per cent of its present age.
In this way, the ability to detect emission lines in distant galaxies allows us to pinpoint at what stage in cosmic history we are seeing them. But of course, the most distant galaxies are also the faintest – you need ever more powerful telescopes if you want to peer back further.
ALMA (consisting of 66 individual telescopes working together) is an incredibly powerful telescope – it is revolutionising our view of the early universe. Not only is it providing exquisite sensitivity, but operates in part of the electromagnetic spectrum that gives access to a wide range of emission lines.
Gravitational lensing. Photo credit: NASA, ESA & L. Calcada
Gravitational lensing. Photo credit: NASA, ESA & L. Calcada
To help matters, the team also exploited a natural telescope: a massive cluster of galaxies. Light from MACS1149-JD1 has had to pass through this intervening cluster on its journey to ALMA. This is so massive that it significantly warps spacetime, meaning that the light is “bent” in a process called gravitational lensing. Gravitational lensing amplifies the brightness of MACS1149-JD1, making it a little easier to see.

Indirect glimpse of first stars

MACS1149-JD1 is not the most distant galaxy on record, but what this new study adds to our understanding is an insight into the history of the formation of the galaxy. This happened hundreds of millions of years before the current observation, and much further back than even the most distant galaxy known.
In fact, the presence of oxygen in the galaxy tells us that star formation must have been going on for some time in MACS1149-JD1. That’s because oxygen can only be formed within stars in a process called stellar nucleosynthesis. But what we don’t know is when those stars first ignited.
By combining data from the Hubble Space Telescope, the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope, the authors made a model of the “stellar population” within MACS1149-JD1. This allowed them to estimate the mixture of stars that give rise to the emission from the galaxy observed in certain bands of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The model involves estimating the “star formation history” of the galaxy, describing the rate of production of stars in the past. The modelling suggests that, in order to produce the observed emission, stars must have started forming just 250m years after the Big Bang, when the universe was just two per cent of its present age. In other words, MACS1149-JD1 was already a fairly well established galaxy, even at this early time.
This is a huge scientific accomplishment as it is currently impossible to observe galaxies that existed 250m years after the Big Bang. However, the new James Webb Space Telescope, which is due for launch in 2020, may be able to do so.
But until then, thanks to the new study, we now have a way of indirectly studying when stars first formed in ancient galaxies like MACS1149-JD1. In effect, by observing the blossom, astronomers have estimated when the bud first opened.
James Geach, Royal Society University Research Fellow, University of Hertfordshire.
This article first appeared on The Conversation.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Indian-American scientist Anita Sengupta is the brain behind NASA's latest project
After a year of waiting, NASA's Cold Atom Laboratory will go to the International Space Station and the main brain behind this project is the Indian-American ...
India Today
Indian-American brain behind key Nasa project
India News: MUMBAI: The main brain behind Nasa's latest physics experiment to create the coldest spot in the universe — Anita Sengupta, an Indian-American ...
Using Laser cooling, NASA is about to create the coldest temperature in the Universe
Since ancient times, the absolute zero temperature concept has always been a source of fuel for the scientific community. This is the temperature near which all ...
CrazyEngineers