economictimes.indiatimes.com › Industry › Auto › News › Passenger Vehicle
13 hours ago - The Mercedes India head said that nearly 65% of electricity in the country is produced using sources such as gas, oil, and coal. NEW DELHI: Roland Folger, the head of Mercedes Benz in India, has raised doubts over the government's intention to entirely switch over to electric ...
9 hours ago - Folger said that a large portion of E-cars pollute more than BS4 because the electricity used to power electric cars is produced using fossil fuels ...
E-cars pollute more than BS4 vehicles: Roland Folger, head of Mercedes India
Roland Folger, the head of Mercedes Benz in India, has raised doubts over the government's intention to entirely switch over to electric vehicles by 2030, saying that the cumulative pollution due to electric cars is higher than BS4 vehicles. Folger said that a large por tion of the electricity used to power electric cars is produced using fossil fuels, which pollute the environment to an even higher degree.
Recommended By Colombia
"So far, no one has been able to dispute the fact that electric vehicles would be dirtier than a Bharat Stage 4 vehicle," Folger told TOI as he questioned the government's target of having an entire fleet run on electricity by 2030. "How can it make sense? I think there will be an equal distribution of around 30% for petrol, diesel and electric. That would make a lot of sense."
The Mercedes India head said that nearly 65% of electricity in the country is produced using sources such as gas, oil, and coal. "... those power plants do not have any cleansing filters or whatever. They blow everything up in the air, and that's why they can produce electric power for very cheap."
Also, the low electricity prices may not hold on for long, especially with increased usage by vehicles owners. On the other hand, the price of diesel and other fuels will go down with less usage across the world, making them more affordable and desirable. Folger also said that it will be expensive for the Indian economy to make investments into cleanerrenewable power sources or charging stations at the pace at which the demand for power will come. "The investments into a nuclear power plant, or into greener technologies like wind, hydro and solar, can only be re covered by charging more for the electricity... electricity price could easily become more expensive than the equivalent in diesel. So, what are people going to buy?" He said developed economies, including countries such as Germany , have not been able to afford the transition."It doesn't happen in Europe, and now Europe has tonnes of more money for these kind of issues, but it still doesn't work... India is still a country that does not have these kinds of budgets, even post-GST."
Pointing to large amount of CO2 emissions during the manufacture of batteries, Folger said, "... the production of the battery leads to heavy CO2 emissions ... that it takes nearly 7-8 years until they can lay out their benefits." He said that safe disposal of batteries will be another critical issue as the government pushes for electric vehicles.
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo at the Yad Vashem -- The World Holocaust Remembrance Center on March 5, 2017. Photo Credit: AFP / Getty Images / Mehahem Kahan
ALBANY, N.Y. - Police in New York state may soon have a high-tech way of catching texting drivers: a device known as a "textalyzer" that allows an officer to quickly check if a phone has been in use before a crash.
Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday directed the Governor's Traffic Safety Committee to examine the technology, as well as the questions about privacy and civil liberties its use would raise.
"Despite laws to ban cellphone use while driving, some motorists still continue to insist on texting behind the wheel — placing themselves and others at substantial risk," Cuomo said in a statement first reported by The Associated Press. "This review will examine the effectiveness of using this new emerging technology to crack down on this reckless behavior and thoroughly evaluate its implications to ensure we protect the safety and privacy of New Yorkers."
The device is called the "textalyzer" because of its similarity to the Breathalyzer, which is used to identify drunk drivers. Once plugged into a person's phone for about a minute, it will indicate whether a motorist was texting, emailing, surfing the web or otherwise using his or her cellphone before a serious crash. The textalyzer would not access actual information on the phone, such as pictures, personal emails or web browsing history.
The "textalyzer" is still some months away from being ready, according to Cellebrite, the Israel-based tech company developing the device.
Digital privacy and civil liberties groups already have questioned whether the technology's use would violate personal privacy, noting that police can already obtain search warrants if they believe information on a private phone could be useful in a prosecution.
Many security experts are skeptical when it comes to promises that the textalyzer would only access information about phone usage, and not personal material, according to Rainey Reitman, of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit organization that advocates for civil liberties when it comes to digital technology.
"I am extremely nervous about handling a cellphone to a law enforcement officer and allowing them in any way to forensically analyze it," she said. "This is a technology that is incredibly problematic and at the same time is unnecessary. There are already legal avenues for a police officer."
Westchester County resident Ben Lieberman lost his 19-year-old son Evan to a fatal car crash in 2011 and later discovered the driver of the car his son was in had been texting while driving. He's now a leading advocate for the textalyzer and has worked with Cellebrite on the project. He said he understands concerns about personal privacy but that they're unfounded, noting that the device would only tell police whether a driver had been breaking the law.
"A Breathalyzer doesn't tell you where you were drinking, or whether it was vodka or Jack Daniels — just that you were drinking," he said. "This is the right balance between public safety and privacy."
Count Emily Boedigheimer as a supporter of the idea. The Albany area resident said she's fine with police using a textalyzer, as long as there are rules about what police would be able to see.
"If you're texting and driving you're breaking the law and you're risking people's lives," she said during a lunchtime walk in downtown Albany on Wednesday. "Why can't you wait, or pull over, to make that one call or read your texts?"
The committee will hear from supporters and opponents of the technology, law enforcement officials and legal experts before issuing a report, Cuomo's office said. Particular areas of focus will include the effectiveness of the technology, constitutional and legal issues as well as how the device would be used in practice.
Sen. Terrence Murphy, a Westchester County Republican, sponsored legislation this year that would have set out rules for the use of the textalyzer. The bill didn't get a full vote, but Murphy said he believes it's only a matter of time before New York and other states adopt the technology.
"It's not if, it's when," he said. "This will literally save lives."
Under Murphy's bill, a motorist who refuses to hand over their phone to an officer could have their license suspended.
Twelve people were killed and 2,784 were injured in cellphone-related crashes in New York state from 2011-2015, according to figures from the Institute for Traffic Safety Management and Research. State statistics show 1.2 million tickets for cellphone violations were issued in that same time period.
Sep 26, 2016 - It isn't usually normal for telecom companies to just give away data ... come out and accused Jio of sending call data to third party servers ... The only thing changed perhaps, is that Jio has managed to amass millions of users to its networks. ... Reliance Jio stands for affordability, says CMD Mukesh Ambani ...
Oct 10, 2016 - This list of the 10 richest tech billionaires in the world comes from a ... video game studios like Riot Games (makers of the world's most popular game, "League of Legends"). ... Though Google has changed over the years, the company and ... Database software for businesses and government, so-called ...
These are the 10 wealthiest tech billionaires in the world
SOON INDIA\S VERY OWN TECH BILLIONAIRE ,USING ALL THAT DATA OF USERS USING FREE TELEPHONE AND SUBSIDIZED DATA INTERNET
"There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" (alternatively, "There is no such thing as a free lunch" FREE TELEPHONY AND SUBSIDIZED INTERNET IS A WAY TO BECOME A TECH BILLIONAIRE AND ENCASH ON IT LATER
==============================================
BELOW -OFFICIAL DATA COLLECTION OF INTERNET USERS--I THINK SO--MAY BE I AM WRONG ;ALSO KNOWN AS BIG BROTHER
This page contains HTTP resources which may cause mixed content
affecting security and user experience if blog is viewed over HTTPS.
Fix Dismiss Learn more <img
alt="10. Pony Ma" class="lazy loaded"
data-original="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782833,width-640,resizemode-4/10-Pony-Ma.jpg?257058"
data-slide="image" id="image-slide1"
src="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782833,width-640,resizemode-4/10-Pony-Ma.jpg?257058"
style="display: inline;" title="10. Pony Ma"> THIS IS ALSO KNOWN AS DATA SPYING BY $&(*****) <img alt="9.
Michael Dell" class="lazy loaded"
data-original="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782832,width-640,resizemode-4/9-Michael-Dell.jpg?32836"
data-slide="image" id="image-slide2"
src="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782832,width-640,resizemode-4/9-Michael-Dell.jpg?32836"
style="display: inline;" title="9. Michael Dell"> <img alt="8.
Steve Ballmer" class="lazy loaded"
data-original="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782831,width-640,resizemode-4/8-Steve-Ballmer.jpg?795589"
data-slide="image" id="image-slide3"
src="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782831,width-640,resizemode-4/8-Steve-Ballmer.jpg?795589"
style="display: inline;" title="8. Steve Ballmer"> <img
alt="7. Jack Ma" class="lazy loaded"
data-original="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782830,width-640,resizemode-4/7-Jack-Ma.jpg?1117049"
data-slide="image" id="image-slide4"
src="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782830,width-640,resizemode-4/7-Jack-Ma.jpg?1117049"
style="display: inline;" title="7. Jack Ma"> <img alt="6.
Sergey Brin" class="lazy loaded"
data-original="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782829,width-640,resizemode-4/6-Sergey-Brin.jpg?63268"
data-slide="image" id="image-slide5"
src="http://www.businessinsider.in/thumb/msid-54782829,width-640,resizemode-4/6-Sergey-Brin.jpg?63268"
style="display: inline;" title="6. Sergey Brin"> (5 more...)
The
devices currently used to pump blood around the body in lieu of a
healthy heart have their drawbacks. With this in mind, scientists have
now developed a silicone heart that beats much like the real thing,
something that could provide a safer and more comfortable way to keep
the blood pumping. Read more
New low-cost smart glove can translate sign language
Shares1
Sun, 16 Jul 2017-04:43pm , PTI
Scientists have created a low- cost smart glove that can wirelessly
translate sign language into text and control objects in virtual reality
games.
The device, called "The Language of Glove," was built for less than
USD 100 using stretchable and printable electronics that are
inexpensive, commercially available and easy to assemble.
"Gesture recognition is just one demonstration of this glove's
capabilities," said Timothy O'Connor, a PhD student at the University of
California San Diego.
"Our ultimate goal is to make this a smart glove that in the future
will allow people to use their hands in virtual reality, which is much
more intuitive than using a joystick and other existing controllers,"
said O'Connor.
"This could be better for games and entertainment, but more
importantly for virtual training procedures in medicine, for example,
where it would be advantageous to actually simulate the use of one's
hands," he said.
The glove is unique in that it has sensors made from stretchable materials, is inexpensive and simple to manufacture.
"We've innovated a low-cost and straightforward design for smart
wearable devices using off-the-shelf components," said Darren Lipomi, a
professor at UC San Diego.
"Our work could enable other researchers to develop similar
technologies without requiring costly materials or complex fabrication
methods," said Lipomi, senior author of the study published in the
journal PLOS ONE.
The team built the device using a leather athletic glove and adhered
nine stretchable sensors to the back at the knuckles - two on each
finger and one on the thumb.
The sensors are made of thin strips of a silicon-based polymer
coated with a conductive carbon paint. The sensors are secured onto the
glove with copper tape.
Stainless steel thread connects each of the sensors to a low power,
custom-made printed circuit board that's attached to the back of the
wrist.
The sensors change their electrical resistance when stretched or
bent. This allows them to code for different letters of the American
Sign Language alphabet based on the positions of all nine knuckles.
A straight or relaxed knuckle is encoded as "0" and a bent knuckle is encoded as "1."
When signing a particular letter, the glove creates a nine-digit binary key that translates into that letter.
For example, the code for the letter "A" (thumb straight, all other
fingers curled) is "011111111," while the code for "B" (thumb bent, all
other fingers straight) is "100000000." The low power printed circuit
board on the glove converts the nine-digit key into a letter and then
transmits the signals via Bluetooth to a smartphone or computer screen.
The glove can wirelessly translate all 26 letters of the American
Sign Language alphabet into text. Researchers also used the glove to
control a virtual hand to sign letters in the American Sign Language
alphabet.
(This article has not been edited by DNA's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)
Last year, we showed you the massive size of the universe
(hint, it’s REALLY big). But in a universe that large — and given the
Milky Way Galaxy itself is so expansive — why haven’t aliens contacted
us? That’s the essence of the Fermi Paradox.
The idea is this: It shouldn’t be out of the question that there are
many sophisticated civilizations across the galaxy. Given the age of the
Milky Way itself (about 13.21 billion years), even a cosmically small
sliver of time (like 10 million years) should be enough for some type of
contact to occur.
Italian physicist Enrico Fermi is credited with bringing this
question into the scientific forefront. According to stories, the
genesis of the Fermi Paradox came during a 1950 lunchtime discussion
with colleagues. They all thought it reasonable to speculate that we
were not alone, and that we likely have a lot of company. But Fermi
began to wonder, if that’s true then where is everyone?
Think about it in terms of humankind’s own space accomplishments.
We’re on the cusp of interstellar space travel, and likely will send our
first interstellar probes within the next few decades. That’s less than
a century after mankind first sent a human being into space. In
hundreds, thousands, if not millions of years, what could we do?
This point wasn’t lost on Fermi and his companions, even years before
the first humans made it to space. An alien race should have no trouble
colonizing the galaxy with a decent amount of rocket technology and
some imperial wherewithal — especially in ten million years.
But scientists need proof though, and there’s little if any
scientifically accepted evidence to back up the notion that we’re not
alone in the universe. Even so, and using physics as an excuse for
limiting speed of any alien spacecraft, it just doesn’t make sense.
Take Proxima Centauri, for example. Even going just a quarter of the
speed of light, an alien craft could make it to Earth in 16 years. The
planets around Gilese, 60 years. The slew of potentially habitable planets around TRAPPIST-1?
About 160 years. That’s a long time, but nowhere near the 10 million
year timeframe Fermi and his colleagues discussed, and a drop in the
bucket when compared to the age of the Milky Way Galaxy itself.
The Drake Equation
Let’s shift gears to understand further why the Fermi Paradox gives
astrophysicists fits. The Drake Equation is a simple mathematical
formula first proposed by astronomer Frank Drake in 1961. Simply put, it
tries to estimate the number of technologically advanced and
communicating societies present in the galaxy. It looks like this:
Over the years, many astrophysicists have attempted to estimate each
of the values, but here’s what they have come up with. R can also be
thought of as the number of stars in the galaxy, which is currently
estimated at 100 billion. Even on the low end, the fraction of
good stars with planetary systems is thought to be about 20 percent, and
those with “ecoshells” — life sustaining atmospheres — thought to be at
least one per star. For the sake of argument, let’s say only 10 percent
could actually develop lifeforms capable of human intelligence and
communication. We’re eliminating quite a few possibilities, since that’s
10 percent of 10 percent of 10 percent.
Finally, “L” is a fraction of time the planet has borne communicable
life. We’ll assume that they’ve been on their planet for as long as we
have, so we make this 1/100,000,000. So, we’ve been awfully pessimistic.
What is our result?
Two. So us, and somebody — or thing — else. It’s hard to
believe that other civilizations haven’t been around longer than us.
There are also other pre-technology civilizations that Drake’s Equation
doesn’t even address. This leaves us with even more questions.
The Kardashev Scale
Adding to the debate is something called the Kardashev scale. Created
by Soviet Russian astronomer Nikolai Kardashev, it classifies
civilizations by the amount of usable energy they can harness. These
classes are:
Type I. This civilization has the ability to use all energy available on their planet.
Type II. This civilization can harness all the energy radiated by its star.
Type III. This civilization can harness the energy of the entire galaxy.
Carl Sagan put us about 70 percent of the way to Type I, and we
should be able to achieve it within a century or two. Current
calculations estimate we will reach Type II in a few thousand years, and
to Type III within 100,000 to a million years.
At Type II or III, a civilization should be able to speed across the
galaxy at close to the speed of light (or faster, if they’ve managed to
discover ways to bend the current laws of physics). Things get even more
mysterious.
So what gives?
The problem with the Fermi Paradox is that we might not ever be able
to confirm or deny it, unless we either gain the technology to scan
every planet in the galaxy, find aliens ourselves, or they find us. In
the meantime, we’re left to speculate why we still haven’t heard from
any galactic neighbors. The Great Filter
One explanation is known as The Great Filter theory. In simplified
terms, “The Great Filter” is an evolutionary step that is so difficult
to surpass that most civilizations cannot surpass it. This prevents
civilizations that could eventually gain spacefaring capabilities from
doing so, simply because they destroy themselves first.
But there’s no consensus on where this Great Filter is located on the
path from the origins of a civilization to a Type III on the Kardashev
scale. Some even argue that we’ve already surpassed it, or that there
are actually multiple ‘Great Filters.’ We also have no way of knowing
how far we’ve come in the process, and we could simply be the
most evolved species currently in existence.
Another version of the theory argues that we haven’t even made it to
one of these Great Filters, and that we’re destined for destruction just
like everybody else. The discovery of fossilized complex lifeforms on
other planets could lend credence to this theory — but that hasn’t
happened yet. There’s a reason for the silence
Another line of reasoning speculates that it’s not necessarily the
Great Filter, but a host of other reasons for why we haven’t heard from
aliens yet. Here are a few possibilities: They were already here. Aliens could have visited us
thousands of years ago, and we’d have no way of knowing. Early humans
had no way to describe what they were seeing in modern terms. In fact,
they’d probably consider it a sign from God himself. But there is merit
to this theory, in spite of that crazy-haired guy from Ancient Aliens.
Some of the structures built by early man are so extraordinarily
complex that they defy explanation even in our modern society. They’re too advanced, and don’t care. Galactic
snobbery may be at play. Spacefaring societies may already know about
us, but believe Earth has nothing to offer. So they pass us by, and will
continue to do so until we’re interesting to them. We live in the Galactic version of the boondocks.
Other portions of the galaxy may already be colonized, it’s just that
Earth and the solar system are in a remote area. This would prevent them
from getting to us easily, and vice-versa. Safety reasons. interstellar chatter might attract the attention of aggressive species aimed at galactic domination — think Star Trek’s
Borg. This species may have also wiped out other communicative
species, which is actually a tad bit scary if you think about it. We
could be next! We’re too primitive. Maybe signals from other
civilizations are already out there, and our current communications
technologies are too primitive to either pick out those signals, or
we’re listening the wrong way (applying our techniques for communication
transmission to an alien society which might be doing things completely
differently). Think of it like turning on the radio to the wrong
station. We live in The Matrix. Perhaps the most depressing
explanation is that none of this reality is actually real, and it’s all
just a simulation. The theory has gained some speed over the past decade
or two, and it would indicate that we are alone, and an experiment for
another, far more advanced civilization’s scientific curiosity.
As you can see, there’s a multitude of reasons — all of them even in
the slightest bit plausible — for why the search for alien life has come
up fruitless. But until we find concrete proof, the Fermi Paradox will
continue to keep astrophysicists busy trying to explain the eerie
galactic silence.
It might not be Fermi after all…
In the interest of complete accuracy, we should mention that Fermi was not the first scientist to speculate on this issue, and some accounts dispute
he was even speaking of the lack of alien contact in terms of the
actual existence of alien life during that lunch conversation. As early
as 1933 astronautical theorist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky was speculating on
many of the same issues that Fermi is credited for, although in
unpublished manuscripts.
Fermi’s rumored discussions were the first to be extensively debated
in the scientific community, and he’s received many of the accolades —
fair or not. They are already here
THE ALIEN IS HERE -MANY OF THEM EVERYWHERE LOOK AND FIND OUT
Dynamo Magician Impossible - Best NEW Magic Trick - 2015.
comment:-any body here believe in a life after life ? i
do; and that is one of the many other worlds which are around ;but we
cannot reach in our present body and our limited sensory ability such worlds are in a parallel universe with different physical,chemical,biological laws may be far in the future we will have ability to reach the parallel universes