Brilliant scientist but...

'I'm Not Afraid': What Stephen Hawking Said About God, His Atheism And His Own Death

Stephen Hawking said during an interview with El Mundo in 2014: "Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe.

384 Shares
EMAIL
PRINT
COMMENTS
'I'm Not Afraid': What Stephen Hawking Said About God, His Atheism And His Own Death
Stephen Hawking died at his home in Cambridge in England on 14th March.
British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking schmoozed with popes during his lifetime, even though he was an avowed atheist. The famous scientist,who died Wednesday in England at 76, was often asked to explain his views on faith and God. During interviews, he explained his belief that there was no need for a creator.

He said during an interview with El Mundo in 2014: "Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. What I meant by 'we would know the mind of God' is, we would know everything that God would know, if there were a God, which there isn't. I'm an atheist."

That followed comments made to Reuters in 2007 in which Hawking, who had lived with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease or ALS) since 1963, described himself as "not religious in the normal sense."

"I believe the universe is governed by the laws of science," he said. "The laws may have been decreed by God, but God does not intervene to break the laws."

Because of his involvement in the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, which fosters "interaction between faith and reason and encouraging dialogue between science and spiritual, cultural, philosophical and religious values," he visited the Vatican over the years. Hawking gave a talk on "The Origin of the Universe" during the group's 2016 conference at the Vatican.

During those visits, he met with religious leaders, includingPope Francis andPope Benedict XVI. In his comments to the Academy in 2010, Benedict XVI seemed to refer to Hawking,saying, "Scientists do not create the world; they learn about it and attempt to imitate it."

In Hawking's writings about the universe's origin, he and co-author Leonard Mlodinow posited in the 2010 book, "The Grand Design," that the big bang was inevitable.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing," the book states. "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."

In discussing the book, he toldABC News: "One can't prove that God doesn't exist. But science makes God unnecessary. . . . The laws of physics can explain the universe without the need for a creator."

Hawking's earlier best-selling cosmology book, "A Brief History of Time," also discussed black holes and the big bang. The 1988 book offered his "theory of everything" that understanding the universe offers a glimpse of "the mind of God."

He also explained throughout his life his thoughts on a possible afterlife,saying, "I believe the simplest explanation is, there is no God. No one created the universe and no one directs our fate. This leads me to a profound realization that there probably is no heaven and no afterlife either. We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe and for that, I am extremely grateful."

In 2011, his comments to the Guardian explained his stance further: "There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark."


Comments
Hawking, who was born Jan. 8, 1942, and lived with his disease for much longer than expected, also said during the interview: "I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first."

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


 Brilliant scientist but LACKS IN common sense

British physicist, cosmologist, astronomer, theoretician and writer.


Common sense - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_sense



Common sense is sound practical judgment concerning everyday matters, or a basic ability to perceive, understand, and judge that is shared by ("common to") nearly all people.[1] The first type of common sense, good sense, can be described as "the knack for seeing things as they are, and doing things as they ought to be done."
Related image

 ......................................................................
LACKS IN-The second type is sometimes described as folk wisdom, "signifying unreflective knowledge not reliant on specialized training or deliberative thought." The two types are intertwined, as the person who has common sense is in touch with common-sense ideas, which emerge from the lived experiences of those commonsensical enough to perceive them.[2]


Related image
John Lennox
Mathematician
John Carson Lennox is a Northern Irish mathematician specialising in group theory, philosopher of science and Christian apologist. Wikipedia
Born7 November 1943 (age 74), Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Doctoral studentsHoward Smith

Professor John Lennox | God DOES exist - YouTube

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otrqzITuSqE
Dec 21, 2012 - Uploaded by OxfordUnion
Professor John Lennox gives his argument for the existence of God. SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ▻ http://is ...
 Image result for Stephen Hawking at pearly gate

 




 
Image result for Stephen Hawking at pearly gate






what next after ohmibod-waiting for ohmec***K and that will be the end of all paid s**

OhMiBod Brand - LoveLife Toys

www.lovelifetoys.com/OhMiBod-Brand
Masks · Sensory · Restraints · Arousal & Libido · For Him · For Her · Rear Gear · Toys · Lubes · Books · Featured Brands · Lovelife · OhMiBod · Sliquid · Aneros · Bijoux Indiscrets · Bristols 6 · BlueMotion · Club Vibe · Rings & Things · Kissable Fun · Books & Games · Sexy Wearables · Acsexories · Personal Care · Kits · Steals & ...

OhMiBod - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OhMiBod
OhMiBod is an American company which manufactures sex toys. It is based in New Hampshire, United States. Its name is used as a collective reference to the whole family of remote controlled and/or musically-powered, today (2017) chiefly Bluetooth-driven, vibrating sex toys. The device originally translated an electronic ...
Products‎: ‎Esca, Lovelife
Founder‎: ‎Suki Dunham; Brian Dunham
=============================================

Want to have better sex? Sex in augmented reality is going to change ...

https://qz.com/.../want-to-have-better-sex-sex-in-augmented-reality-is-going-to-chang...
Jun 20, 2017 - The future of Snapchat filters could allow you to have virtual sex with whoever you want ... As soon as we overcome the turn-off of holding a bulky piece of glass and rare-earth metals between you and your lover, augmented-reality sex could become the next big kink thing. Augmented reality (AR) uses a ...

How Virtual Reality Will Change Sex and Dating by 2020 (NSFW)

https://www.makeuseof.com › Future Tech
Jul 31, 2015 - How Virtual Reality Will Change Sex and Dating by 2020 (NSFW) ... Virtual Reality is rapidly improving, and it's going to transform the most intimate areas of life. .... My colleague, Ryan, has written about the emerging technology of humanoid sex robots, and how they might change the future of sex. I tend to ...

Rise of the ROBOSEXUALS: Humans will have virtual reality sex by ...

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Rise-ROBOSEXUALS-Humans-virtual-reality-sex-2030-droi...
Oct 5, 2015 - Rise of the ROBOSEXUALS: Humans will have virtual reality sex by 2030 and droid trysts will be more popular than human love-making in 2050, expert ... A report, authored by Dr Pearson, looks at how sex will evolve and predicts love and sex will become increasingly separate in the future, as robots take ...

The Future of Virtual Reality's & Sex #TOA17 - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvZUV8wJ2PQ
Jul 18, 2017 - Join Bryony Cole, host of the leading sextech podcast Future of Sex, for a live podcast discussion exploring how virtual reality will impact our most intimate lives. Bryony is joined by Xavi Clos, Head of Production at BaDoink VR. The company recently released the first sex-ed programs in VR: Virtual ...

What's the future of virtual sex? | Stuff You Should Know

https://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/podcasts/virtual-sex.htm
Feb 2, 2017 - In the not too distant future, sex may not involve being in the same room as your partner. In fact, your partner may not even have to be a human. We're talking virtual sex here. Couple VR with high tech, smart sex toys and intercourse as we know it may be a thing of the past. Except not really.

Robots, VR... The Future Of Sex Is Virtual | VRROOM

https://www.vrroom.buzz/vr-news/trends/robots-vr-future-sex-virtual
Dec 18, 2016 - Tillie Demetriou Investigates: Sex in the digital age. Sex. It needs no introduction and statistics show that globally we spent approximately £15b a year on the adult entertainment industry alone. But with the emergence of robots and virtual reality porn, the need for a human partner is becoming less and less.

Love, Virtually: The Future of Sex & Dating in Virtual Reality

www.freshmana.net/love-virtually-the-future-of-sex-dating-in-virtual-reality/
Nov 6, 2016 - Among the shiny new toys promising a bright future in virtual reality was a lot of talk about social connection; not surprising considering the company is owned by Facebook. The executives at Oculus were vehement about their goal of creating a VR environment and devices where people could connect and ...

The Future of Sex: How Intimacy is Transforming - Futurism

https://futurism.com/the-future-of-sex-how-intimacy-is-transforming/
Jan 11, 2017 - From virtual fantasies to human augmentation, the Future of Sex looks into the five major fields driving the next innovations in intimacy. ... While the field is still in the fledging stage, in the coming decades long-distance sex will become more appealing, realistic, and emotionally intense. Innovation is ...

Einstein made his share of errors. Here are three of the biggest{{ NBCNews.com 24m ago}}

Einstein made his share of errors. Here are three of the biggest

Lucky for us, he was a persistent sort.

by Dan Falk /
Physicist Albert Einstein stands beside a blackboard with mathematical calculations written across it in 1921.Hulton Archive via Getty Images
Get the Mach newsletter.
Even people who know little about Albert Einstein’s work know he was brilliant — so clever that his name is synonymous with genius. Of course, the mind that gave us the theory of general relativity, the 1915 masterwork that sealed Einstein’s scientific reputation, was human. And so Einstein made his share of mistakes.
Here’s a close look at three times the great physicist, born on Pi Day (March 14) 139 years ago today, got things wrong.

1. Starlight bends — but how much?

Place a heavy ball on a sheet of rubber, and the ball's weight distorts the sheet. Einstein realized that something similar happens in space: Gravity from stars and other massive objects bends the paths of nearby light rays. If a ray of light from a distant star passes the sun on its way to Earth, for example, it should bend enough to cause a tiny shift in the observed position of the star.
It’s not easy to test this idea. For one thing, the shift is truly minute. And the blinding light of the sun can make distant stars hard to see. But astronomers realized that even a tiny shift ought to be visible during a total solar eclipse, when light from the sun is blotted out.
Einstein performed a series of calculations to determine the size of the predicted shift but initially muffed the effort, arriving at a number that was half the correct value.
Had the astronomers managed to test this number in their initial eclipse-viewing efforts, their observations wouldn’t have matched his prediction. But their attempts were stymied by weather in 1912 and by war in 1914. By the time they made the necessary observation, in the spring of 1919, Einstein had corrected his blunder — and astronomers saw exactly the shift that he had predicted.

2. Gravitational waves don’t exist — or do they?

The discovery of gravitational waves in 2016 was hailed as a triumph of Einstein’s theory, the confirmation of a prediction made in 1916. But as you might suspect, there’s more to the story.
Soon after developing general relativity, Einstein began to wonder if there might be a wave associated with gravity as there is with electromagnetism. (Electromagnetic waves include visible light as well as radio waves, microwaves, and X-rays.)
Einstein moved on to other problems. When he returned to it two decades later, he concluded that gravitational waves waves couldn’t exist because they’d create “singularities” — regions in which space and time are stretched to infinity.
 A scientist is silhouetted against a visualization of gravitational waves during a press conference by the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute) at the Leibniz University in Hanover, Germany, Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016. U JULIAN STRATENSCHULTE / EPA
But Einstein had goofed because of the mathematical coordinate system he used to tackle the problem. It's a bit like what happens with the latitude and longitude used to track positions on Earth, says University of Arkansas physicist Daniel Kennefick. It works fine in most places on the planet. But as one gets close to the poles, lines of longitude converge and the system breaks down.
"It doesn't mean the North Pole doesn't exist — it's a real place — it's just that the coordinate system breaks down," Kennefick says.
Einstein hadn't shown that gravitational waves couldn't exist, only that they couldn't exist in the mathematical system that he'd used.
When Einstein submitted a paper arguing that gravitational waves don't exist to Physical Review, the journal’s editor sent it back to for revisions. Outraged, Einstein withdrew it. By the time he submitted it to another journal, he had corrected his mistake. The revised paper argued that gravitational waves do, in fact, exist.

3. Einstein and the expanding universe

Einstein was uncomfortable with some of relativity’s implications, including one of the biggest — that the universe isn’t a static thing but an entity that must expand or contract. This was unthinkable to Einstein, who believed the universe existed in a “steady state.”
So Einstein added a fudge factor to his equations, a kind of energy associated with empty space. This cosmological constant allowed for a stable universe. But sure enough, astronomers in the 1920s confirmed that the universe was expanding. Einstein later called the cosmological constant the “greatest blunder” of his career.
Einstein's resistance to the idea of an expanding universe makes sense in light of his classical education, says Marcia Bartusiak, a science journalism professor at MIT and the author of several books on the history of physics. His schooling took place in the 1880s and 1890s, when the prevailing wisdom — based on physics going back to the work of Isaac Newton — was that the universe was static. An expanding cosmos simply "didn't fit with his view of how the universe acted," she says. But when astronomers showed Einstein the data, he came around.
“He listened to the evidence, from [astronomer Edwin] Hubble,” Bartusiak says. "He admitted his error.”

Related

(In the late 1990s, astronomers discovered that the universe is not only expanding but expanding at an accelerating rate. Now they wonder if something like Einstein’s cosmological constant is playing a role — which means his earlier “mistake” may in fact have been an idea ahead of its time.)
Einstein’s errors take nothing away from his extraordinary achievements. Indeed, they would hardly be noteworthy if they involved a lesser thinker. And the fact that he didn’t let himself be derailed by his missteps — that he changed course in light of new evidence — is a hallmark of his brilliance, says historian Jürgen Renn.
“He persisted, in spite of incredible obstacles, in spite of the errors,” says Renn, director of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin. “And in the end, he came up with one of the most revolutionary theories in all of physics.”
FOLLOW NBC NEWS MACH ON TWITTER, FACEBOOK, AND INSTAGRAM.
MORE FROM mach

Elon musk copied underground mail tunnels and renamed it as hyper loop-

Elon musk copied underground mail tunnels and renamed it as hyper loopImage result for riding in underground postal tunnels 1900

The Victorian Hyperloop: the forgotten pneumatic railway beneath ...

CityMetric
... an engineer who was one of the key players in the Victorian era's “railway mania”. They were going to build a new kind of underground railway.



Postal Museum, London: What it's like to ride London's hidden ...

www.traveller.com.au › Europe › England › London
Nov 7, 2017 - For almost a century this underground railway was the main means of communication for millions of people living in and around London. Considered to be the social network of the 1900s, the underground Mail Rail was the equivalent of email and Facebook, connecting millions of Londoners daily via posta

Underground Mail Road; Modern Plans for All-but-Forgotten Delivery ...

www.nytimes.com/.../underground-mail-road-modern-plans-for-all-but-forgotten-deli...
May 7, 2001 - In the bowels of New York City a century ago, not only was there the whoosh of water through pipes and the whiz of subways through tunnels, there was ... In describing the system's effectiveness during a snowstorm, a 1914 congressional report of the Pneumatic Tube Postal Commission said: ''New York ...



Postal Museum, London: What it's like to ride London's hidden underground railway



  • Pin to Pinterest

  • Twenty-one metres below the streets of London, there is a vast, sophisticated network of railway tunnels that stretches more than 10 kilometres.
    For almost a century this underground railway was the main means of communication for millions of people living in and around London. Considered to be the social network of the 1900s, the underground Mail Rail was the equivalent of email and Facebook, connecting millions of Londoners daily via postal mail.
    Unbeknown to many Londoners, the complex network of Mail Rail, which operated from the 1920s until 2003, exists beneath today's London underground. At its peak, the railway ran for 10.4 kilometres from Paddington to Whitechapel and was made up of six sorting offices with a mainline railway station. Running 22 hours a day, the railway transported on average 4 million letters a day across the capital from post box to the delivery address and it employed 220 staff.
    Visitors to central London's Postal Museum, which opened in late July this year, can ride on one of the railway's driverless trains, a replica of the historic trains that used to travel the railway. London's Mail Rail was the world's first railway serviced by driverless electric trains. Its introduction was hailed as a significant technological and communication innovation for a city that was suffering serious delays in postage delivery because of traffic congestion on London's streets. In those days, the postal service operated twice daily, which meant that if you sent mail in the morning, you could expect a reply by the afternoon. The frequency may seem like "snail-mail" by today's email standards, but its purpose and relevance as London's key method of communication, business or personal, reveals the enormity and scale of Mail Rail's operations.
    A round-trip on the Mail Rail train, which started running in early September, takes about 15 minutes and begins at what used to be the Mount Pleasant depot. Each passenger gets a train car to themselves; it's a rather compact space but big enough for one person. My train is red and looks rather like a Lego toy. The train slowly pulls out of the platform; picking up speed as it meanders around corners in the low light  and makes short stops along the way. The ride includes montages and a story describes the railway's working life, from its 1930s heydays to World War II, as well as giving personal anecdotes from people who worked on the railway.
    The museum also features several exhibitions at the same location. At the Mail Rail exhibition retired trains and large rail equipment that was used to build and maintain the railway are on display. The exhibition takes a closer look at the engineering feats behind the inception and legacy of the railway. The Postal Service exhibition features modern stamp designs, including Penny Blacks, the world's first adhesive postage stamps, a selection of retro posters and magazines from the 1950s and 60s, and post buses that were used to deliver mail to remote or rural areas.



    Mail Rail: London's best new train line | Ars Technica

    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/07/london-mail-rail-postal-museum/
    Jul 28, 2017 - The Mail Rail's most recent rolling stock was built way back in 1980; it didn't have any seats, nor was it really rated for human transportation through some rather rough-looking tunnels. So, the Postal Museum—the charity that now operates the railway—commissioned some brand-new trains from Severn ...


    Image result for riding in underground postal tunnels 1900

    The Victorian Hyperloop: the forgotten pneumatic railway beneath ...

    CityMetric
    ... an engineer who was one of the key players in the Victorian era's “railway mania”. They were going to build a new kind of underground railway.

    The Victorian Hyperloop: the forgotten pneumatic railway beneath the streets of London

    An engraving of a similar system at Crystal Palace in 1864. Image: Wikimedia Commons.
    Since the opening of the first underground railway in London over 150 years ago, we’ve settled on a mix of different ways for moving people through cities: train, tram, bus, car, bike, bus, foot. Over the years, though, major cities could afford to experiment with some pretty far-out technologies.
    So it is with the London Pneumatic Despatch Railway (LPDR), a Futurama-ish tube that carried parcels and people beneath the capital in the 1860s.
    I first stumbled across the LPDR when reading up about pneumatic tubes after Elon Musk announced his Hyperloop idea. If you missed it, he wants to send people in capsules through a 570km-long pneumatic low-pressure tube from Los Angeles to San Francisco at speeds of up to 962km/h (yeah, really).
    I read that, then saw this:
    Image: Royal Mail Group Ltd. 2013, courtesy British Postal Museum & Archive.
    That's a party of Victorians gathered around a pneumatic despatch tube”, and they look like they're going to send those two men through it in a carriage. What the hell was this thing?
    To find out, I asked Julian Stray, the senior curator of the British Postal Museum & Archive (BPMA). The story begins in the middle of the 19th century, at the height of the British Empire. And it’s all about mail.
    “The General Post Office (GPO) was the routing hub of the whole country,” Stray explains. “You would have had the foreign mails, the inland mails, the country mails, the mails to the provinces. Speed is everything. A loss of two minutes required a written explanation to one of the directors or the Postmaster General.”
    The bandwidth of this system was throttled by the narrow streets between the stations on London’s edge, and the GPO sorting office in the middle near St Paul's Cathedral – horse and carriage traffic jams could have Empire-wide knock-on effects. And, in an example of what Stray calls “that Victorian endeavour, that willingness to have a go regardless of the cost of failure”, some canny entrepreneurs spotted a business opportunity.
    A group of men came together to form the Pneumatic Despatch Company. Its board was headed by the 3rd Duke of Buckingham, a close friend of Disraeli’s. Also involved were bookstore magnate WH Smith (yes, that WH Smith), and Thomas Brassey, an engineer who was one of the key players in the Victorian era’s “railway mania”. They were going to build a new kind of underground railway.
    Image: Royal Mail Group Ltd. 2013, courtesy BPMA.
    In the summer of 1861, Thames steamship passengers floating past Battersea Pier would have seen a curious experiment laid out on the river bank: 411m of cast-iron tunnel, 80cm tall and a little bit narrower than that wide, with carriages disappearing into one end and reappearing at the other. It was a pneumatic tube, big enough for bags of mail and people. Grinning lads would climb into the carriages, lie under a blanket, and get fired along the tube at speeds up to 30mph.
    Pneumatic tubes are still around today, in places like hospitals and banks. Most major cities in Europe and North America had their own pneumatic telegraph networks in the latter half of the 19th century, before the electrical telegraph took over though some networks lasted for decades beyond then. François Truffaut’s 1969 film Baisers Volés features a scene with a character sending a letter via Paris’ still-operational pneumatic telegraph:
    The modern pneumatic capsule system was invented by engineer William Murdoch in the 1830s. These were tubes of a few inches in diameter, designed to carry small, light items, like letters. Powered by a steam engine, they worked on the principle of suck or blow (and that's not how Musk's Hyperloop would work, by the way, which achieves its high speeds by sucking the air out of the tube so there's minimal air resistance for capsules riding on rails). It's a simple system, and inevitably some engineers in the mid-19th century wanted to scale it up to something big enough to carry people.
    The most famous of these is probably Alfred Beach, whose 1870 Beach Pneumatic Transit was the first subway line in New York City (and which might be most famous now for its brief cameo in Ghostbusters). A tube-shaped train that could carry 22 people sat flush within a 2.4m-wide tunnel, blown along a 95m test track beneath Broadway. It was a popular tourist attraction at the time, but Beach failed to get investors interested in backing him in extending it into a proper underground railway (and a stock market crash in 1873 didn’t help either).
    There was a similar demonstration railway built in 1864 in Crystal Palace for the Great Exhibition, and there were some other experimental pneumatic trains in places like Devon, Dublin and Croydon, but there was never a full run at the idea that lasted very long. Pneumatic tubes are incredibly expensive to maintain when scaled up to the size of normal trains.
    Of all the pneumatic railways, though, the LPDR is the oldest it’s actually the second-oldest underground railroad in the world, opening only a year after the first Paddington-Farringdon line of the Underground and the longest-lasting of them all. “As a system it was fantastic,” Stray says. “But it was a failure.”
    The LPDR was built in two parts. The first, in 1863, was a single tunnel (the same size as the test one at Battersea) running from beneath platform one of Euston station to the Eversholt Street sorting office, a third of a mile away. But the second part, built between 1863 and 1866, was the main project: two tunnels, 2.8km from Eversholt Street to Holborn and 1.5km from Holborn to the main GPO office near St Paul’s. Let’s map it:
    The reason it takes a long dog-leg detour down Tottenham Court Road is that the Duke of Bedford, who owned most of the land between Euston and Holborn, refused the Pneumatic Despatch Company permission to mine its tunnels underneath. It was a bigger tunnel than before, too 1.5m wide running just beneath the road surface.
    “It is phenomenal,” says Stray. “They had 21-foot-wide centrifugal fans at first powered by so-called ‘Cornish engines’, but they kept on handling it with bigger and bigger engines. It was some weight being transported in these things. Two of the carriages would be carrying about 12 tonnes, journeying at up to 30mph.” That's not bad it was more than twice as fast as the 12mph trains on the Paddington-Farringdon line.
    When it opened, the great and the good of London’s political and business class turned out at Holborn station to watch the first bags arriving from Euston – and to have a ride on it themselves.
    “People would travel on it, clutching a tallow candle on their chest. It was the Alton Towers of its time. Occasionally as they came near the road surface they could hear the clatter of horse’s hooves on the cobble stones. It would dip down under Holborn, occasionally as it went low there would be a splash of water and a smell of rust, and they could tell where they were. There was a lovely report of a lady who was shot the entire length of the system, ‘who emerged virtually unscathed, crinoline and all’.” Visitors to London, including the son of Napoleon III, gave the LPDR a try.
    Yet despite proving a smash hit as a novelty, the LPDR proved rubbish at what it needed to do most of all transport mail. The stations at each end were in basements, and once you factored in the time it took to lug the heavy sacks up and down staircases at either end there wasn’t any kind of time saving compared to the horse and carriage. This became a bigger problem when times began to slip beyond nine minutes for each leg.
    It slipped down to about 17 to 20 minutes [from] loss of gas, loss of pressure, Stray explained. Occasionally there would be complete breakdowns where someone would have to crawl into the tube with a length of rope, tie it around the carriages and draw them out. Also there was an ingress of water, and occasionally wet bags, and the last thing you wanted was damaged mail.”
    There was also political opposition to the LPDR from within the GPO, which had been forced into paying for this expensive experiment by Parliament. They were probably looking for a reason for it not to work that’s my suspicion, Stray said. Business dried up. In October 1874, the last train left for the GPO, and it closed for good after soaking up £200,000 in costs – that's £1.9m in today's money. They really only had a decade of use.
    Perhaps the most surprising thing about the LPDR is how quickly it faded from memory. Transport blogger Ian Mansfield found an article from the Windsor Magazine in 1900 detailing the rediscovery of "London's lost tunnel", which is amazing for something that was barely a quarter-century old at the time.
    By the 1920s, when the Post Office realised it could use its old pneumatic railway tunnels for laying down telephone wire, it had the problem that it had no idea where the tunnels actually were and, when it got down there, it found that sections had been destroyed by newer construction projects, or used by companies illegally for storing things like lumber. Gas had a tendency to build-up in the city's sewers at the time, causing pavement explosions, but in 1928 a gas build-up in the old LPDR tunnel near the junction of High Holborn and Kingsway caused one of the most serious of the era (known at the time as Holborn Explosion).
    It lifted the ground for hundreds of metres in each direction, said Stray. It blew in shop fronts. There were flames that were 30 feet high in the air, that burned for hours on end. Below ground, where a lot of premises had cellar space, the walls were blown in a few inches. One man was killed, and thousands of pounds of damage was recorded.
    All we have left of the LPDR are two of the carriages from the small tunnel between Eversholt Street and Euston. They were found in 1930 during construction work at Euston, and are currently kept at the British Postal Museum & Archive in Debden. The rest of the tunnels those not destroyed by more modern construction works are probably caved in, filled with rubble, or otherwise lost.
    Here's Rammell's 1958 map of where he thought the LPDR would eventually run:
    Image: Royal Mail Group Ltd. 2013, courtesy BPMA.
    The hope was that key government buildings like the Houses of Parliament, India House, Custom House, the Tower of London, the Royal Mint, and the Bank of England – would all be linked up. In the end, a traditional railway built in 1927 the Mail Rail pulled off much of what Rammell dreamed of, linking Paddington to Whitechapel via several of Royal Mail's key London offices.
    Mail Rail closed in 2003, becoming a thing of legend among the capital's urban exploration community (and only finally conquered by explorers in 2011). The BPMA is currently trying to raise funds to build a new Mail Rail museum and offer tours of certain closed sections, and from 2019 it hopes to offer rides on a replica train through a kilometre of the tunnels. Unlike the LPDR this piece of London history hopefully shouldn't be lost to memory.
    Yet we should wonder about what might have been had the technology for the LPDR been a little bit more reliable, or its backers willing to lose a little bit more money. This was ambition, said Stray. This was 'railmania', a time when the supplements to things like the Times would carry a thousand proposals like this. People lost many millions of pounds. There is little surviving of this, little surviving headed notepaper, there’s no signage or anything like that. But there are the stories.
    Ian Steadman is the editor of How We Get To Next. This article was originally published on our sister site the New Statesman in 2013, when Ian was its tech writer.
    Want more of this stuff? Follow CityMetric on Twitter or Facebook.