Scientists read minds with infrared scan wetenschap/technologie | The Mark | 18 Februari 2009 | 20:41:49



Scientists read minds with infrared scan
 
 
Researchers at Canada's largest children's rehabilitation hospital have developed a technique that uses infrared light brain imaging to decode preference

- with the goal of ultimately opening the world of choice to children who can't speak or move.
 
In a study published this month in The Journal of Neural Engineering, Bloorview scientists demonstrate the ability to decode a person's preference for one of two drinks with 80 per cent accuracy by measuring the intensity of near-infrared light absorbed in brain tissue.
 
"This is the first system that decodes preference naturally from spontaneous thoughts," says Sheena Luu, the University of Toronto PhD student in biomedical engineering who led the study under the supervision of Tom Chau, Canada Research Chair in pediatric rehab engineering.
 
Most brain-computer interfaces designed to read thoughts require training. For example, in order to indicate yes to a question, the person needs to do an unrelated mental task - such as singing a song in their head.
 
The nine adults in Luu's study received no training. Prior to the study they rated eight drinks on a scale of one to five.
 
Wearing a headband fitted with fibre-optics that emit light into the pre-frontal cortex of the brain, they were shown two drinks on a computer monitor, one after the other, and asked to make a mental decision about which they liked more. "When your brain is active, the oxygen in your blood increases and depending on the concentration, it absorbs more or less light," Luu says. "In some people, their brains are more active when they don't like something, and in some people they're more active when they do like something."
 
After teaching the computer to recognize the unique pattern of brain activity associated with preference for each subject, the researchers accurately predicted which drink the participants liked best 80 per cent of the time.
 
"Preference is the basis for everyday decisions," Luu says. When children with disabilities can't speak or gesture to control their environment, they may develop a learned helplessness that impedes development.
 
In future, Luu envisions creating a portable, near-infrared sensor that rests on the forehead and relies on wireless technology, opening up the world of choice to children who can't speak or move.
 
Her work is part of Tom Chau's body-talk research, which aims to give children who are "locked in" by disability a way to express themselves through subtle body processes like breathing pattern, heart rate and brain activity.
 
Luu notes that the brain is too complex to ever allow decoding of a person's random thoughts. "However, if we limit the context - limit the question and available answers, as we have with predicting preference - then mind-reading becomes possible."
 
 

scientists copy a living being's genome and make 'copy cat' artificial life from scratch



Life’s First Spark Re-Created in the Laboratory[news 21 st may 2010] BUT THEY CANNOT GET COPY RIGHT FOR THIS COPY
So God created man in his image... by Fred_T.
COPYING A LIVING BACTERIA'S GENOME AND MAKING USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC KNOWLEDGE TO MAKE A LIFE FROM SCRATCH IS AN ACHIEVEMENT .
BUT ASKING FOR  'COPY RIGHT' OF A LIVING BEING'S GENETIC CODE IS NOT ALLOWED AND ILLEGAL,ESPECIALLY WHEN SUCH AN ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING MADE OUT OF THIS COPIED GENOME OF A BACTERIA OR MAN IS USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSE
rna

NOW THE SCIENTIST WHO MADE THIS ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING  OR LIVING CELL; IS ASKING FOR COPY RIGHT CLAIMS ;TO USE IT TO MAKE ARTIFICIAL ALGAE ,WHICH IN TURN WILL ABSORB CARBON DIOXIDE FROM ATMOSPHERE ,AND WHICH IN TURN WILL BE USED FOR MAKING ENERGY BY PETROLEUM COMPANIES LET ME POINT OUT UNLESS A SCIENTIST MAKE AN ORIGINAL GENOME AND NOT A GENOME COPIED FROM SOME PRE EXISTING LIVING BACTERIA OR ALGAE OR HUMAN BEING ;HE CANNOT CLAIM OWNER SHIP OF SUCH A COPIED ARTIFICIAL LIVING CELL AND /OR AN ARTIFICIAL HUMAN BEING MADE FROM COPIED GENOME



AuthorAldous Huxley
Cover artistLeslie Holland
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Genre(s)Science fiction,dystopian fiction
PublisherChatto and Windus(London)
Publication date1932
 




  • COMPARISONS WITH GEORGE ORWELL'S NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR

Social critic Neil Postman contrasts the worlds of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World in the foreword of his 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death. He writes:
What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.
1984first.jpg
AuthorGeorge Orwell
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Genre(s)Dystopian, political fiction, social science fiction
PublisherSecker and Warburg(London)
Publication date8 June 1949

 LUCKILY THE ORIGINAL CREATOR CALL HIM GOD OR NATURE IS NOT AFTER MONEY  SO THE ORIGINAL CREATOR IS NOT GOING TO CONTEST IN A COURT WITH SMALL FRY COPY CAT SCIENTISTS ABOUT COPYRIGHT CLAIMS
HOPE THIS IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF MONSTERS  LIKE FRANKENSTEIN IN THE MAKING BY SCIENTISTS


Last and First Men 
First Edition




Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World, Updated With a New Preface

BEGINNING OF THE END?SYNTHETIC LIFE/TERRORISTS&HACKERS




Craig Venter and Hamilton Smith, the two American biologists who unravelled the first DNA sequence of a living organism (a bacterium) in 1995, have made a bacterium that has an artificial genome—creating a living creature with no ancestor 


[1]
 BUT WE HAVE A NATURAL TENDENCY TO MAKE ANY INVENTION INTO DESTRUCTIVE MODE
 WHEN THE FIRST CAR WAS MADE IN 1885  THE FIRST USE WAS TO USE IN WAR 
SIMILARLY WHEN THE FIRST PLANE WAS MADE IN 1903 IMMEDIATELY IT WAS USED IN FIRST WORLD WAR (1914) FOR BOMBING 
[2]
Creating something bad deliberately, whether the creator is a teenage hacker, a terrorist or a rogue state, is a different matter.
[3]
Regulation—and, especially, vigilance—will still be needed;TO Encourage the good to outwit the bad and, with luck, you keep Nemesis at bay.HOPE SO 
 [4]
BUT THERE IS 50-50 CHANCE THE TERRORISTS,THE HACKERS AND CROOKS OUT TO MAKE  EASY MONEY; WILL USE THIS DISCOVERY TO MAKE ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC  LIFE; TO THREATEN HUMAN LIFE OR ALL LIFE ON EARTH AT SOME TIME IN FUTURE
[5]
SUCH PSYCHOPATHS CAN THREATEN TO WIPE OUT WHOLE MANKIND USING A NEW VIRULENT VIRUS .SUCH TERRORISTS CAN  REVIVE AN EXTINCT VIRUS LIKE SMALL POX VIRUS USING THIS MEHTOD TO WIPE OUT HUMAN LIFE 
 THESE MAD PEOPLE CAN MAKE A VIRUS,OR BACTERIA TO INFECT THE AGRICULTURE AND CAUSE WIDE SPREAD FAMINE 
 THE POSSIBILITIES OF SUCH SICK MINDED PEOPLE DESTROYING LIFE FOR MONEY OR A PARTICULAR CAUSE IS PRESENT NOW MORE THAN BEFORE 
 FOR EXAMPLE AUM SHINRIKYO A TERRORIST ORGANISATION OF JAPANA wanted poster in Japan. As of February 2010, three people are still wanted in connection with the Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway:
 WANTED TO DESTROY ALL HUMAN LIFE WITH POISON A hydrogen cyanide device which, had it not been extinguished in time, would have released enough gas into the ventilation system to potentially kill 20,000 commuters WAS USED BY THIS MAD SECT 
[6]
CHANCES OF HIJACKING  AND TAKING OVER OF LABS DOING ARTIFICIAL LIFE RESEARCH BY TERRORISTS TO PRODUCE LIFE THREATENING VIRUSES AND BACTERIA IS ANOTHER POSSIBILITY
ANOTHER DANGER TO LIFE IS UNWANTED OR UNFORESEEN EFFECTS OF SYNTHETIC LIFE FOR EXAMPLE A VIRUS OR BACTERIA MADE ARTIFICIALLY FOR MAKING VACCINE MAY CAUSE REACTIONS,DEATH,OR WILL BECOME UNCONTROLLABLE DUE ANY REASON CAUSING WORLD WIDE PANIC AND DEATH
[7]NOW THE ARTIFICIAL LIFE GOING TO BE PRODUCED IS ONLY BACTERIA AND VIRUS AND SIMILAR SIMPLE LIFE 
BUT LATER DEFINITELY COMPLEX ORGANISMS LIKE BIRDS,ANIMALS AND FINALLY AN ARTIFICIAL MAN WILL BE PRODUCED 
QUESTIONS OF A REAL MAN MARRYING A LAB MADE WOMAN ,QUESTIONS OF CHILDREN BORN OUT 
OF THIS MARRIAGE ; MANY MANY CONFUSING THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN IN A FEW YEARS TIME 
FROM NOW
 Repliee Q1Expo plus Professor Hiroshi Ishiguro (Getty)
Professor Ishiguro (r) stresses the importance of appearance in his robots 
A LOT OF LEGAL ASPECTS WILL ARISE THEN WHETHER TO HAVE MILK
 FROM AN LAB MADE COW?IS IT SAFE?






CAN WE EAT A LAB MADE CHICKEN?






Genetically modified food:-


THESE QUESTIONS ARE EVEN NOW VALID ABOUT BT COTTON[Bt Cotton is produced by inserting a synthetic version of a gene from the naturally occurring soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, into cotton. The primary reason this is done is to induce the plant to produce its own Bt toxin to destroy the bollworm, a major cotton pest. The gene causes the production of Bt toxin in all parts of the cotton plant throughout its entire life span. When the bollworm ingests any part of the plant, the Bt cotton toxin pierces its small intestine and kills the insect.]Gene flow to wild relatives:
As Bt crops are grown close to their wild relatives, it is highly possible that the Bt gene can spread to the wild relatives through pollen transfer. The new genes in the wild plants may produce enough toxins to ward off insects that normally feed on them. Some of the wild plants could grow hardier and act as weeds in the fields. This technology also leads to contamination of other species, as the transgenic plants displace other plants.

 AND BT FRUITS AND BT VEGETABLES AND BT FOOD CROPS :-






  • On August 18, 2006, American exports of rice to Europe were interrupted when much of the U.S. crop was confirmed to be contaminated with unapproved engineered genes, possibly due to accidental cross-pollination with conventional crops.
  • On February 9, 2010, Indian Environment Minister, Jairam Ramesh, imposed a moratorium on the cultivation of GMF "for as long as it is needed to establish public trust and confidence". His decision was made after protest from several groups responding to regulatory approval of the cultivation of Bt Brinjal, a GM eggplant in October, 2009.
  •  NOBODY KNOWS WHETHER GENETICALLY ALTERED FOOD IS SAFE FOR HUMAN HEALTH
  • SIMILARLY NOBODY KNOWS THE NEW LAB MADE ARTIFICIAL LIFE WILL KILL US OR HELP US