Closed-Circuit TV Ads May Be Watching You Back [SOON SENSORS TRANSMITTED THROUGH INTERNET AS BUGS/VIRUS TO WATCH YOU ON SCREEN] Watch an advertisement on a video screen in a mall, health club or grocery store and there's a slim — but growing — chance the ad is watching you too. Small cameras can now be embedded in the screen or hidden around it, tracking who looks at the screen and for how long. The makers of the tracking systems say the software can determine the viewer's gender, approximate age range and, in some cases, ethnicity — and can change the ads accordingly. That could mean razor ads for men, cosmetics ads for women and video-game ads for teens. And even if the ads don't shift based on which people are watching, the technology's ability to determine the viewers' demographics is golden for advertisers who want to know how effectively they're reaching their target audience. While the technology remains in limited use for now, advertising industry analysts say it is finally beginning to live up to its promise. The manufacturers say their systems can accurately determine gender 85 to 90 percent of the time, while accuracy for the other measures continues to be refined. The concept is reminiscent of the science-fiction movie "Minority Report," in which Tom Cruise's character enters a mall and finds that retinal scanners identify him and prompt personalized ads that greet him by name. But this technology doesn't go nearly that far. It doesn't identify people individually — it simply categorizes them by outward appearances. So a video screen might show a motorcycle ad for a group of men, but switch to a minivan ad when women and children join them, said Vicki Rabenou, the chief measurement officer of Tampa, Fla.-based TruMedia Technologies Inc., one of the leaders in developing the technology. "This is proactive merchandising," Rabenou said. "You're targeting people with smart ads." Related Stories Because the tracking industry is still in its infancy, there isn't yet consensus on how to refer to the technology. Some call it face reading, face counting, gaze tracking or, more generally, face-based audience measurement. Whatever it's called, advertisers are finally ready to try it, said advertising consultant Jack Sullivan, a senior vice president of Starcom USA in Chicago. "I think you're going to see a lot of movement toward it by the end of this year in the top 10 markets," he said. Because face tracking might feel reminiscent of Big Brother, manufacturers are racing to offer reassurances. When the systems capture an image of who's watching the screen, a computer instantly analyzes it. The systems' manufacturers insist, however, that nothing is ever stored and no identifying information is ever associated with the pictures. That makes the system less intrusive than a surveillance camera that records what it sees, the developers say. The idea still worries Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil-liberties group in San Francisco. Tien said it's not enough to say some system is "not as bad as some other technology," and argues that cameras that study people contribute to an erosion of privacy. In general, the tracking systems work like this: A sensor or camera in or near the screen identifies viewers' faces by picking up shapes, colors and the relative speed of movement. The concept is similar to the way consumer cameras now can automatically make sure faces are in focus. When the ad system pinpoints a face, it compares shapes and patterns to faces that are already identified in a database as male or female. That lets the system predict the person's gender almost immediately. "The most important features seem to be cheekbones, fullness of lips and the gap between the eyebrows," said Paolo Prandoni, chief scientific officer of Quividi, a French company that is another player in face-tracking technology. Others include Studio IMC Inc. in New York. The companies say their systems have become adept at determining a viewer's gender, but age is trickier: The software can categorize age only in broad ranges — teens, younger to middle-aged folks and seniors. There's moderate demand for ads based on ethnic information, but the companies acknowledge that determining ethnicity is more challenging than figuring out gender and age range. Prandoni provided The Associated Press a limited version of Quividi's software, which uses an ordinary webcam to stream video to a computer. The trial version tracked gender only, using color-coded circles to distinguish male and female faces. The sample size was too small to be statistically significant, but it was accurate about 80 to 90 percent of the time. That might be as precise as the systems ever get, said Deborah Mitchell, a professor of consumer psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Even the human brain can't always determine gender, age or ethnicity. Still, "even if it gets to 70 percent accuracy, that's still giving you a wealth of information," said Mitchell, who teaches in the Wisconsin School of Business. That information is certainly valuable to Bill Ketcham, the chief marketing officer of Adspace Networks Inc. His New York company sells video advertising on 1,400 video screens at 105 malls around the nation. Adspace is testing six TruMedia systems at malls in Winston-Salem, N.C., Pittsburgh and St. Louis. The kiosks display a daily list of top 10 sales at the mall, as well as paid advertising that comes largely from movie studios and TV networks. A 15-second video ad that replays across Adspace's national network can cost as much as $765,000 per month. So advertisers expect rigorous information about who sees the spots — information that face tracking can now provide, Ketcham said. For now, at least, Adspace isn't changing the ads based on who's watching — Ketcham said the kiosks' audiences are so large that it wouldn't be practical to personalize ads to individuals. While advertisers like the face-tracking technology, another privacy advocate, Harley Geiger, questions whether it should be used on consumers without their knowledge. Geiger, staff counsel for the Center for Democracy & Technology in Washington, D.C., said advertisers should be telling consumers what details about them are being collected and for what purpose. "With the technology proliferating, now or the short-term is the time to consider privacy protections," he said. "If you don't build it in at an early stage it becomes very difficult to build it into an already established system." |
Closed-Circuit TV Ads May Be Watching You Back maatschappij/internationaal | The Mark | 18 Februari 2009 | 20:38:34
Scientists read minds with infrared scan wetenschap/technologie | The Mark | 18 Februari 2009 | 20:41:49
Scientists read minds with infrared scan
Researchers at Canada's largest children's rehabilitation hospital have developed a technique that uses infrared light brain imaging to decode preference
- with the goal of ultimately opening the world of choice to children who can't speak or move.
In a study published this month in The Journal of Neural Engineering, Bloorview scientists demonstrate the ability to decode a person's preference for one of two drinks with 80 per cent accuracy by measuring the intensity of near-infrared light absorbed in brain tissue.
"This is the first system that decodes preference naturally from spontaneous thoughts," says Sheena Luu, the University of Toronto PhD student in biomedical engineering who led the study under the supervision of Tom Chau, Canada Research Chair in pediatric rehab engineering.
Most brain-computer interfaces designed to read thoughts require training. For example, in order to indicate yes to a question, the person needs to do an unrelated mental task - such as singing a song in their head.
The nine adults in Luu's study received no training. Prior to the study they rated eight drinks on a scale of one to five.
Wearing a headband fitted with fibre-optics that emit light into the pre-frontal cortex of the brain, they were shown two drinks on a computer monitor, one after the other, and asked to make a mental decision about which they liked more. "When your brain is active, the oxygen in your blood increases and depending on the concentration, it absorbs more or less light," Luu says. "In some people, their brains are more active when they don't like something, and in some people they're more active when they do like something."
After teaching the computer to recognize the unique pattern of brain activity associated with preference for each subject, the researchers accurately predicted which drink the participants liked best 80 per cent of the time.
"Preference is the basis for everyday decisions," Luu says. When children with disabilities can't speak or gesture to control their environment, they may develop a learned helplessness that impedes development.
In future, Luu envisions creating a portable, near-infrared sensor that rests on the forehead and relies on wireless technology, opening up the world of choice to children who can't speak or move.
Her work is part of Tom Chau's body-talk research, which aims to give children who are "locked in" by disability a way to express themselves through subtle body processes like breathing pattern, heart rate and brain activity.
Luu notes that the brain is too complex to ever allow decoding of a person's random thoughts. "However, if we limit the context - limit the question and available answers, as we have with predicting preference - then mind-reading becomes possible."
scientists copy a living being's genome and make 'copy cat' artificial life from scratch
Life’s First Spark Re-Created in the Laboratory[news 21 st may 2010] BUT THEY CANNOT GET COPY RIGHT FOR THIS COPY

COPYING A LIVING BACTERIA'S GENOME AND MAKING USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC KNOWLEDGE TO MAKE A LIFE FROM SCRATCH IS AN ACHIEVEMENT .
BUT ASKING FOR 'COPY RIGHT' OF A LIVING BEING'S GENETIC CODE IS NOT ALLOWED AND ILLEGAL,ESPECIALLY WHEN SUCH AN ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING MADE OUT OF THIS COPIED GENOME OF A BACTERIA OR MAN IS USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSE

NOW THE SCIENTIST WHO MADE THIS ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING OR LIVING CELL; IS ASKING FOR COPY RIGHT CLAIMS ;TO USE IT TO MAKE ARTIFICIAL ALGAE ,WHICH IN TURN WILL ABSORB CARBON DIOXIDE FROM ATMOSPHERE ,AND WHICH IN TURN WILL BE USED FOR MAKING ENERGY BY PETROLEUM COMPANIES LET ME POINT OUT UNLESS A SCIENTIST MAKE AN ORIGINAL GENOME AND NOT A GENOME COPIED FROM SOME PRE EXISTING LIVING BACTERIA OR ALGAE OR HUMAN BEING ;HE CANNOT CLAIM OWNER SHIP OF SUCH A COPIED ARTIFICIAL LIVING CELL AND /OR AN ARTIFICIAL HUMAN BEING MADE FROM COPIED GENOME
LUCKILY THE ORIGINAL CREATOR CALL HIM GOD OR NATURE IS NOT AFTER MONEY SO THE ORIGINAL CREATOR IS NOT GOING TO CONTEST IN A COURT WITH SMALL FRY COPY CAT SCIENTISTS ABOUT COPYRIGHT CLAIMS
HOPE THIS IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF MONSTERS LIKE FRANKENSTEIN IN THE MAKING BY SCIENTISTS

Last and First Men


COPYING A LIVING BACTERIA'S GENOME AND MAKING USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC KNOWLEDGE TO MAKE A LIFE FROM SCRATCH IS AN ACHIEVEMENT .
BUT ASKING FOR 'COPY RIGHT' OF A LIVING BEING'S GENETIC CODE IS NOT ALLOWED AND ILLEGAL,ESPECIALLY WHEN SUCH AN ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING MADE OUT OF THIS COPIED GENOME OF A BACTERIA OR MAN IS USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSE
NOW THE SCIENTIST WHO MADE THIS ARTIFICIAL LIVING BEING OR LIVING CELL; IS ASKING FOR COPY RIGHT CLAIMS ;TO USE IT TO MAKE ARTIFICIAL ALGAE ,WHICH IN TURN WILL ABSORB CARBON DIOXIDE FROM ATMOSPHERE ,AND WHICH IN TURN WILL BE USED FOR MAKING ENERGY BY PETROLEUM COMPANIES LET ME POINT OUT UNLESS A SCIENTIST MAKE AN ORIGINAL GENOME AND NOT A GENOME COPIED FROM SOME PRE EXISTING LIVING BACTERIA OR ALGAE OR HUMAN BEING ;HE CANNOT CLAIM OWNER SHIP OF SUCH A COPIED ARTIFICIAL LIVING CELL AND /OR AN ARTIFICIAL HUMAN BEING MADE FROM COPIED GENOME
| Author | Aldous Huxley |
|---|---|
| Cover artist | Leslie Holland |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Genre(s) | Science fiction,dystopian fiction |
| Publisher | Chatto and Windus(London) |
| Publication date | 1932 |
- COMPARISONS WITH GEORGE ORWELL'S NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR
Social critic Neil Postman contrasts the worlds of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World in the foreword of his 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death. He writes:
What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.
| Author | George Orwell |
|---|---|
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Genre(s) | Dystopian, political fiction, social science fiction |
| Publisher | Secker and Warburg(London) |
| Publication date | 8 June 1949 |
LUCKILY THE ORIGINAL CREATOR CALL HIM GOD OR NATURE IS NOT AFTER MONEY SO THE ORIGINAL CREATOR IS NOT GOING TO CONTEST IN A COURT WITH SMALL FRY COPY CAT SCIENTISTS ABOUT COPYRIGHT CLAIMS
HOPE THIS IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF MONSTERS LIKE FRANKENSTEIN IN THE MAKING BY SCIENTISTS
Last and First Men
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)